Britain’s government is establishing itself as one that
no foreign power in their right mind should trust.
The conditions to Britain leaving the EU with the “withdrawal
agreement” (a legal document) included Britain having specific obligations, in
particular about Northern Ireland. It has since come to light that, not
entirely surprisingly, the government – under Boris Johnson’s tutelage – has been
looking at finding ways to “get around” the obligations on Northern Ireland they
agreed to with the EU - to ignore them while pretending they haven't. The minutiae of those obligations don’t matter so much
here as much as the message that Britain is clearly sending to the EU: “You
trust us to do what we agreed to? More fool you”
A "rogue state"
The message this sends to the EU, and to the rest of
the world watching, is that post-EU Britain is happy to act as a “rogue state”
in terms of its legal obligations. If you sign a treaty with Britain, its
government is saying, don’t expect us to honour it; we have no honour.
Britain’s imperial past has many examples of how it has abandoned its obligations, legal or moral. Ireland knows all about that,when the British government allowed a million Irish people to starve to death.
But Britain has been masterful over the years in creating a myth of Britain
always siding with the “good guy”; of being a beacon for democracy and human
rights. It was always much more cynically pragmatic than that in reality, only
surrendering its colonies when they no longer became economically viable or
worth the military effort to hold on to; it has also been a friend to many
loathsome regimes at one time or another.
The British government today seems to believe its own
historic myths, which may be one reason why the government is acting in such
bad faith with the EU. In falling for its own myth of Britain as an “exceptional” nation, it follows that its politicians think international rules don’t apply
to them. The fact that Britain (through its numerous tax havens) is the leading
instigator of global tax evasion tells you enough. The EU tolerated this kind
of behavior when Britain was a member state (and Luxembourg is likewise
culpable in that regard, if on a much smaller scale); but now Britain is
outside the EU and is self-evidently set on a strategic path that opposes (or
is actively hostile to) the EU’s interests, Britain can only be regarded as a
threat. The fact that the British government is happy for it to be known that
its promises amount to nothing tells the EU that it is dealing with a hostile
power.
The fact that the British government disseminates lies
can hardly be surprising either. Even the Prime Minister in his earlier career as
a journalist became infamous for creating “fake news”, long before the term was
widely-used. Nothing that comes from the government’s mouth should be taken at
face value; its signature on a legal document is apparently meaningless as
well. It only chooses to abide by agreements when it suits them.
This, then, is the meaning of a “rogue state” when
applied to Britain’s government: one that has a selective application of the
rule of law. While Britain’s legal system has long been respected around the
world, its twisted application of law means that London is the litigation
capital of the world. “Brexit Britain” is a country where judges are seen by
parts of the media as “enemies of the people”, while the government – and the
infamous Home Office in particular – are habitual exploiters of the legal
system to overturn judgments that go against them. The fact that these attempts
are often expensive failures is just a sign of how the government happily
misuses public funds simply on a savage point of principle.
This doesn’t even mention how the government is
routinely denying the legal rights of citizens on a daily basis: people like
the “Windrush generation”, some of whom have been denied their rights, lost their jobs and deported (or exiled) for just having the wrong skin colour. The same is
expected to happen to many Europeans too, given time.
Then there are the tens
of thousands of homeless whose plight is often due to a collapse of the social
care system. Britain as a “rogue state” is one where many of the mentally ill
and disabled are abandoned by the state to fend for themselves on the street,
with a system designed to torment them yet further. Britain today is a country that allows some of its mentally ill and disabled to literally starve to death. It isn’t the government’s active policy; it simply doesn’t care what happens to them.
The “rogue state” that Britain is becoming is an
inevitable consequence of the “Brexit Agenda”: not caring about rules; not caring about the consequences of its actions. It is, at its heart, an amoral
creed.
Brexit Britain is a project ran by and headed by shysters and charlatans, crooks and ne’er-do-wells. Its agenda can only appeal to the worst
elements of human nature: cranks who see it as an opportunity to pursue their own fringe obsessions; vultures who see Britain as a way to make their fortune at
other people’s expense; careerists who see it as the easiest way to advance
themselves, no matter how.
This has been true in many other countries as well, of
course. Britain is just rediscovering its corrupt heart, with all the other
corrupt countries in the world looking on at Britain as another member of their
rogue’s gallery.
The irony of Britain’s “rogue status” in the eyes of
the rest of the world is that it is a self-defeating cause. Going back to the
issue of Northern Ireland, making things more difficult for the Republic of
Ireland only makes things harder on relations with the USA as well as the EU;
for the US Congress is a huge supporter of Ireland, and no trade deal can be
endorsed without its support. So the British government’s “FU” attitude to the
EU is also a two fingers to the USA as well. This leaves Britain without the
support of both its closest trading bloc and the most powerful country in the
world.
Maybe this is why Britain’s government post-EU is
cosying up to China and the Gulf States: one-party states and autocratic
monarchies might be where Britain’s government sees its future: as "dodgy" banker, private tutor, luxury goods maker and tech provider to the world’s least democratic states.
No comments:
Post a Comment